tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6325606.post9155546682255805328..comments2024-01-30T05:43:35.265-05:00Comments on WhitesCreek Journal: Not again...Diebold wins it for Hillary?Whites Creekhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07272181564543086371noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6325606.post-58754754832348000092008-01-16T00:38:00.000-05:002008-01-16T00:38:00.000-05:00we can trust the corporations.. and while we are a...we can trust the corporations.. and while we are at it ..we can count on cnn and fox for unbiased news .haAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6325606.post-48650969039307955352008-01-11T19:00:00.000-05:002008-01-11T19:00:00.000-05:00Hi bizgrrl. :)I see the point, but I don't think t...Hi bizgrrl. :)<BR/><BR/>I see the point, but I don't think there's a choice between ATM machines that print and one's that don't. I don't see why there should be one concerning voting machines. There shouldn't be two different kinds. Just the ones that do print.<BR/><BR/>But you ask the single most valid question there is in America today,<BR/><BR/>Who can we trust?<BR/><BR/>Dennis Kucinich, Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6325606.post-1537444981229942312008-01-11T15:53:00.000-05:002008-01-11T15:53:00.000-05:00Which means the only reason the voting machines do...<I>Which means the only reason the voting machines don't is to enable vote fraud. There's no other possible rationalization.</I><BR/><BR/>In speaking to someone in charge of picking voting machines, they said price was an issue when electing not to choose one with a printer. <BR/><BR/>Although, I would be afraid many people would take this as something negative against Clinton, I think it would Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6325606.post-21377327778312822872008-01-11T12:28:00.000-05:002008-01-11T12:28:00.000-05:00The possibility of Diebold treason popping up agai...The possibility of Diebold treason popping up again cannot be overlooked simply because of Hillary's corporate-friendly ways. <BR/>It wouldn't hurt at all to verify if the paper trail, which is there to double check in the first place, is actually working. New Hampshire is a good place to test it and we have plenty of time to do it.<BR/><BR/><I>"I keep wondering why I get a paper copy of a 99 Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6325606.post-66466524669454316972008-01-11T10:06:00.000-05:002008-01-11T10:06:00.000-05:00It would depend on the frame. These machines have ...It would depend on the frame. These machines have a paper trail. My own state of Tennessee, does not have this as a mandatory requirement. If the paper ballots back up the electronic count, everyone could be relieved and we could point out how valuable the paper was in reassuring the public. <BR/><BR/>I keep wondering why I get a paper copy of a 99 cent transation at Burger King and can't get oneWhites Creekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07272181564543086371noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6325606.post-26681110379140373662008-01-11T09:54:00.000-05:002008-01-11T09:54:00.000-05:00I'm not convince the same anomolies exist as in Oh...I'm not convince the same anomolies exist as in Ohio and Florida (as well as in others states in the 2000 election especially). Obama's final numbers were what was expected in numerous polls, one university poll (local) had it pretty much right on. I think the differential is also accounted for in the downturn of Edwards and a slighter upturn in Hillary's which Zogby said he was seeing in his Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07890823249067335980noreply@blogger.com